(Source: livealifethatscompletelyfree, via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)
(Source: livealifethatscompletelyfree, via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)
Every time I look back to this photo, I feel uncomfortable — it haunts me. It’s as if they are saying to me, we are not a number — not only cheap labor and cheap lives. We are human beings like you. Our life is precious like yours, and our dreams are precious too.
They are witnesses in this cruel history of workers being killed. The death toll is now more than 750. What a harsh situation we are in, where human beings are treated only as numbers.
This photo is haunting me all the time. If the people responsible don’t receive the highest level of punishment, we will see this type of tragedy again. There will be no relief from these horrific feelings. I’ve felt a tremendous pressure and pain over the past two weeks surrounded by dead bodies. As a witness to this cruelty, I feel the urge to share this pain with everyone. That’s why I want this photo to be seen.
(via timelightbox)
Click that link. This is a picture that needs to be seen just as badly as the endless failures of global capitalism, which encourages and necessitates the conditions that made this happen, need to be seriously addressed.
(via mohandasgandhi)
(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)
I said this a long time ago, and I’m saying it again – not only is rape about a rapist having control, but victim blaming is about controlling the female population: what better way to cajole women into standards of purity, decency, “learning how to behave” and sobriety than dangle the threat of “Well, if you don’t, you’ll surely invite rape upon yourselves?” What better way to get “these hoes” and “these broads” to understand that they don’t “know how to behave” than to help drive home the point that rape happens because women do bad things? Better yet, bad things happen to women who aren’t perfect, or at least striving to be. And who defines that “perfect?” Certainly not women.
(Source: suzaneraslan, via stfuconservatives)
Ask yourself this: Do you know the name of any one of the victims killed in the West Chemical and Fertilizer Company disaster? Do you know how many of them there were? Their ages, aspirations, what they looked like, whether they left behind children or what messages they last posted on Facebook? Do you know if there is an explanation yet for what caused the explosion? Or if investigators are still searching for one? You probably don’t know the answer to any of these questions, and I didn’t either until I started writing this article. I didn’t know that as of Sunday, April 21, four days after the explosion, officials have confirmed fourteen deaths, eleven of whom were first responders, and that as many as sixty people remain missing. I didn’t know the name Jerry Chapman, 25, who volunteered with the Abbot Fire Company and who, according to his girlfriend Gina Rodriguez, was training to be an EMT. I didn’t know the name Cody Dragoo, 50, who was both an employee of the fertilizer plant and a West firefighter (the town has an all-volunteer force). And I had never heard of West firefighter Morris Bridges, 41, who lived just a few doors down from the facility and whose 18-year-old son Brent Bridges stood on the porch as the blast that killed his father blew out the windows of their home.
(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)
So I was talking to my friend Sarah on Skype (A brit) and the subject of Doctor Who came up.
“Oh, you’re a fan of Who? I never thought Americans watched our shows.”
I bet her a dime for every American reblogger, and I happen to be poor as fuck, soooooooo….
Who’s up for it?
AMERICAN WHOVIAN AND PROUD
American Whovian from Arkansas!
Count me and 4 of my non-tumblring friends in!
(via merles-right-hand)
But the absence of a ‘no’ is not the same thing as the presence of a ‘yes.’ And until American culture and law frames sexual consent as proactively, enthusiastically given, there will be no justice for rape victims. It’s time for the U.S. to lose the “no means no” model for understanding sexual assault and focus on “only yes means yes” instead.
(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)
I’m simply saying you can get a work visa and you can get in the normal line. I’m not creating a new line for citizenship. I’m just saying you can get in the current line that exists. The only thing I’m saying is you don’t have to go home.
Rand Paul, attempting to clarify his immigration position
To clarify, the Great Libertarian Hope Rand Paul’s position is that undocumented workers should be able to get some sort of work visa that allows them to live as second-class members of societies while they “get in the current line that exists.”
The problem? There is no general purpose line.
There is, however, a line for “family reunification.” If, for example, your brother is a U.S. citizen and you want to join him, you can wait in that line. If you’re coming from the Phillippines the line is about twenty-four years long.
Rand Paul’s plan to fix immigration doesn’t actually fix immigration.
(via squashed)
(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)
he lowers his wand because he knows that scene. A woman jumps in front of Harry willing to protect him with her own life. He didn’t see this with his own eyes but the resemblance literally disarms him for a moment before he can keep on playing his role.
Go sit in the corner and think about what you’ve done.
(Source: pilgrims, via thatsupergleekywholockianhead)
What I do want to tell you is that you need to stop using the “wives, sisters, daughters” argument when you are talking to people defending the Steubenville rapists. Or any rapists. Or anyone who commits any kind of crime, violent or otherwise, against a woman.
In case you’re unfamiliar with this line of rhetoric, it’s the one that goes like this:
You should stop defending the rapists and start caring about the victim. Imagine if she was your sister, or your daughter, or your wife. Imagine how badly you would feel if this happened to a woman that you cared about.
Framing the issue this way for rape apologists can seem useful. I totally get that. It feels like you’re humanizing the victim and making the event more relatable, more sympathetic to the person you’re arguing with.
You know what, though? Saying these things is not helpful; in fact, it’s not even helping to humanize the victim. What you are actually doing is perpetuating rape culture by advancing the idea that a woman is only valuable in so much as she is loved or valued by a man.
The Steubenville rape victim was certainly someone’s daughter. She may have been someone’s sister. Someday she might even be someone’s wife. But these are not the reasons why raping her was wrong. This rape, and any rape, was wrong because women are people. Women are people, rape is wrong, and no one should ever be raped. End of story.
(Source: hannibalized, via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

Yeah, and at a rate of 3 stories per 2 years, that means we’ll have Sherlock for about 33 more years.
(Source: thenonexistence, via thatsupergleekywholockianhead)
Boehner misreads poll to claim support for GOP cuts.
John Boehner is promoting a new Marist-McClatchy poll which supposedly shows that Americans love cutting government spending. Boehner claims the poll shows that “Americans want spending cuts,” and quotes a Marist official asserting it demonstrates that Americans “are not in a mood to increase taxes.”
Which is funny, because the poll actually shows that majorities of voters would rather increase taxes than cut spending on education, Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid, and infrastructure. In other words, it demonstrates a central fact about public opinion that may help determine how the sequester “blame game” will play: Americans say they love cutting government but suddenly balk in a big way when you start talking about cutting specific programs.
The poll’s toplines do at first glance appear favorable to Republicans. It finds that voters prefer cutting spending to increasing taxes in general by 53-37. It finds that a plurality of Americans think spending cuts won’t impact them — and that as many think the cuts will help the economy or have no impact on it as think the cuts will hurt it.
But here’s the thing, that’s the result you always get — at least, when you aren’t specific about the cuts. People love spending cuts in the abstract, because they seem too think that half or money is overseas as foreign aid and the other half is wasted on dubious scientific studies about democracy in goldfish. But when it’s not just vague “wasteful spending,” government spending suddenly becomes very popular — which the Marist-McClatchy poll found. According to Sargent, “the poll took the welcome step — which I haven’t seen before — of asking whether Americans prefer tax hikes rather than cuts in specific programs.”
Observe:
- by 65-31 they prefer to raise taxes than cut spending on education
- by 60-33 they prefer to raise taxes than cut Social Security
- by 57-36 they prefer to raise taxes than cut Medicare
- by 53-40 they prefer to raise taxes than cut spending for transportation including roads and bridges
- by 50-42 they prefer to raise taxes than cut Medicaid
By using this poll to champion the GOP’s super-awesome stand on the sequester (i.e., let the cuts happen), Boehner is once again signing his caucus’s name to some unpopular cuts. And, of course, he’s making the mistake of pointing out exactly the sort of cuts Republicans are demanding. Worse, since he’s misusing poll numbers to misrepresent public support, he’s basically lying to you about what you believe. I’ll never understand why politicians believe that would work.
In any case, this is the GOP’s schizoid messaging on sequester cuts : if you don’t like them, they were Obama’s idea. But if you do like them, the Republican Party is responsible. As always, cognitive dissonance is no impediment to the resourceful Republican spin doctor.
(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)
I just logged on for the first time in a couple of days because I’ve been busy getting my cousin obsessed with Supernatural…
and lolwhut?
what
the
FUCK
fandom?
WHAT HAPPENED IN MY ABSENCE?
this all happened today hahaha
Today, are you serious? OMFG.
Goddamnit you guys, pull yourselves together!
Is this the kind of burden you’re comfortable putting on retirees, families, and future generations? We must control healthcare costs NOW.
(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)
The board game “Monopoly” was originally invented in the early 20th century to warn players of the dangers of free market capitalism. The original title was “The Landlord Game,” made to show how property owners exploit their tenants with exorbitant rent. The game eventually evolved to include rules that let players charge higher rent if they owned all the railroads or the utility companies. But the endgame scenario of Monopoly is a lot like the endgame of capitalism that we’re witnessing today - no matter how the game starts, the wealth will eventually accumulate in the hands of one player, while the other players have to sell off their property to pay their debt to the owner and, eventually, lose everything they have.
The Endgame of Capitalism (via thurmansnotebook)
Who knew? Fun and revolutionary!
It would be even more realistic if only one player could actually buy property. And everybody else had to just roll and pay.
(via daniellemertina)
(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)
This is the Doctor Who Tumblr Tee Tuesday Giveaway.
It has come to our attention that despite the hundreds of posts on today’s Tee Tuesday tag, people need more Doctor Who t-shirts in their wardrobes.
So we’re doing a giveaway.
Two Doctor Who t-shirts — one for you and one for a friend of yours on Tumblr.
Reblog this post with the Tumblr url of the person you would share this with (they MUST have a Tumblr.) For example, if we were going to share this with the BBC America blog we’d put ‘bbcamerica.tumblr.com’ in our reblog. (But we can’t because we’re both blogs and blogs don’t wear t-shirts. Blogs wear Tumblr themes. And avatars.)
We’ll pick one winner at random and notify you via your Tumblr ask.
A few rules:
Only one reblog per blog (any additional entries will be sent into the Void.)
We’re sorry. We’re so sorry but this Tumblr giveaway is only open to legal residents of the fifty (50) United States including the District of Columbia. Read all of the official terms and conditions here.
If you win and you are under 18, you will need a parent or guardian to sign for you.
Contest ends tomorrow, Wednesday (Feb 27th) evening at midnight (Wednesday into Thursday.)
And HUGE thank you to the fine folks at BBCAmericaShop for donating two shirts to this worthy, worthy cause.
DO WANT
Would share with umphtar.tumblr.com